What about experiential markers of prosperity?

That (GDP) is certifiably not a completely fulfilling proportion of a nation’s advancement is no longer information. The consciousness of GDP’s insufficiencies in uncovering a country’s condition of advancement is presently nearly standard. The driving mantra that “anything that can be estimated can be improved” has been blamed for over the top linearity and misdirecting objectivity. A year in the wake of winning the Nobel Prize in Economics in 1998, Amartya Sen distributed Development as Freedom. The book begins with this straight-shooting articulation: “Improvement can be seen… as a cycle of extending the genuine opportunities that individuals appreciate. Zeroing in on human opportunities appears differently in relation to smaller perspectives on improvement, for example, recognizing advancement with the development of gross public item, or with the ascent in close to home earnings, or with industrialisation, or with innovative development, or with social modernisation.”

After 10 years, in 2009, three financial experts—Sen, Joseph Stiglitz, and Jean-Paul Fitoussi—drove a historic report on options in contrast to GDP, appointed by the at that point French president Nicolas Sarkozy.

For all most recent news, follow The Daily Star’s Google News channel.

At that point, after over a time of contestations and, presently, in the wake of a worldwide pandemic that has both uncovered and amplified the fundamental social disparities across the world, estimating a country’s advancement in an all encompassing and significant manner appears to be more critical than any other time.

Then, since 1972, Bhutan has been advancing a “gross public joy (GNH)” list as an approach to adjust the impact of advancement and the protection of custom with a Buddhist ethos of empathy, satisfaction, and serenity. After the 2008 monetary emergency, the world investigated GNH as a suitable option in contrast to development driven advancement models.

Unexpectedly, when in 2017, the United Nations delivered a report positioning nations by joy, Bhutan came 97th, while Norway guaranteed the title of the most joyful country. Of late, individuals of Bhutan have not been brought together in their country’s self-marking as a “cheerful country.” A Bhutanese radio personality summed up the rising skepticism inside the country thusly: “The possibility of GNH may have made Bhutan famous, yet the idea has been seized by the West—and measured to a certain extent that makes it unrecognizable to normal Bhutanese.”

Estimating bliss stays slippery because of its vexing scope of subjectivities—from joy as close to home feeling at a specific time (I am feeling cheerful on the grounds that I had a frozen yogurt today) to joy as an intellectual assessment of something (I love riding the passenger train since it carries me to my objective securely and promptly consistently).

Numerous specialists have been looking at “prosperity” as a more comprehensive and feasible measurement than the ones that prevalently center around quantifiable pointers like per capita pay. Think about this current: Bangladesh’s per capita GDP is approaching USD 2000. Bangladesh is currently the third quickest developing economy on the planet. A negligible USD 8.75 billion at the hour of its freedom, its economy is required to reach almost USD 500 billion by 2025. The world seems to think about Bangladesh as an example of overcoming adversity. This is extraordinary information.

Be that as it may, the experience of great public improvement in the country’s regular day to day existence is impressively lopsided. On the off chance that you ask a lady while in transit to work close to a bus station in Dhaka about how her life is nowadays, she may answer you like this: life is far superior to before since I can make a decent living, however my home lease is excessively high and tracking down a moderate, quality elementary school for my kids is a consistent battle. Furthermore, I am consistently on edge about being explicitly bothered on open transportation.

In the event that seven out of 10 irregular respondents on the road express pretty much a similar inclination, at that point there is a genuine arrangement need to concoct new markers of the nature of regular day to day existence. This, obviously, doesn’t imply that GDP is outdated. The contention here is that the customary markers ought to be supplemented with different sorts to comprehend the impacts of public improvement on day by day lives.

How could policymakers recalibrate winning measurements to evaluate conditions on the ground? The experience of every day life can be estimated with a blend of quantitative (air quality) and subjective measurements (utilization of zebra going across as a road security apparatus). Could supra-pointers like GDP or other wellbeing measures be supplemented by what could be classified “experiential markers?” (I center here just around urban areas; there ought to be markers for country prosperity as well).

The accompanying experiential pointers could be thought of.

Pathway and Walk Score: People of every single financial class and sex ought to have the option to utilize trails serenely, securely, and pleasurably.

Pathways should have satisfactory width to encourage a two-way common traffic and be liberated from blocks. Numerous urban areas presently use Walk Score to quantify the walkability of a location. Walk Score depends on how long an individual necessities to arrive at a close by metropolitan convenience, (for example, a recreation center or a clinic or a metro station).

The most elevated score is granted to where a convenience is reached shortly by strolling, while zero point is given to those that have offices requiring in excess of a 30-minute walk. A “walker’s heaven” has a Walk Score of 90-100. Walkability makes a city empathetic, vote based, and solid. It addresses a metropolitan territory’s condition of prosperity and the best weapon against oligarchic isolation of the city.

Public transportation: It is presently basic insight that the foundation of reasonable urbanism is mass travel since it is the most financially savvy and climate amicable approach to encourage metropolitan versatility. Urban areas use Transit Score to gauge how well an area is served by mass travel.

It is determined by the helpfulness of public vehicle as far as the courses utilized, recurrence of administration, and openness to the closest station on the course. The approaching raised metro in Dhaka ought to be a helpful second to organize Transit Score as a proportion of metropolitan prosperity in Dhaka.

Squander the executives: Going around in the roads of Dhaka or some other large city in Bangladesh, one would confront the unavoidable ecological catastrophe: the spoiling strong waste in the city. We have a problematically low open cleanliness limit for reasons that require public discussions and powerful anthropological examinations. With Bangladesh’s fast urbanization, the all out strong waste age in urban areas is relied upon to reach as much as 47,000 tons each day by 2025.

On the off chance that 50% of Dhaka’s day by day strong waste stay uncollected in the city, how might GDP decrease the smell? We need Solid Waste Management Score (SWMS) to gauge the condition of general wellbeing in an area. On the off chance that I go to Lalmatia to lease a house, I ought to be capable discover the region’s SWMS and afterward choose whether I should lease there or not.

Admittance to green and regular habitat: Nature is remedial. Metropolitan greenery are our best and least expensive general wellbeing foundations that revive us and keep us solid. Bearable urban communities make scaled down woods as metropolitan desert gardens, fabricating a biological system of trees, birds, wind, air, smell, and calm. A green park can make Zen minutes, bringing down the psychological pressure of furious city life.

City enterprises and regions should begin utilizing the Urban Neighborhood Green Index (UNGI) to survey the amount and nature of green spaces at the local level. Neighborhood rivalries to improve UNGI ought to have an effect at a city scale. The products of monetary development should be knowledgeable about our day by day lives.

Nature of public space: A city without open, walker well disposed, and vote based public spaces resembles a room without a window, choking, claustrophobic, and unfortunate. Public spaces sustain local area soul among metropolitan occupants. In the event that you are in Barcelona interestingly as a vacationer, you are well on the way to visit Las Ramblas prior to discovering Spain’s GDP.

Most “public spaces” in Dhaka are road hubs like Shahbagh Mor, TSC crossing point, or Manik Mia Avenue. None of these nodal places are planned as protected and solid public spaces. What might be Dhaka’s Public Space Index?

Web openness: The worldwide seriousness and computerized vote based system of urban communities will progressively be controlled by their admittance to broadband. Just about a fourth of metropolitan Americans—23% or 62 million individuals—don’t have broadband access. In Brazil it is 38%, India 31%, and Germany 11%. As per an overview directed by the Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics in 2019, in Bangladesh, 62% of families don’t have web access at home.

The explanations behind this difference are nature of the web, reasonableness, IT education, and financial states of a country. In a post-pandemic world, the proportion of a city’s advanced vote based system will be one of the approaches to decide its reasonableness and prosperity. The nature of the virtual space will be just about as significant as the actual space. Nonetheless, estimating the unfavorable impacts of unnecessary online utilization, especially web-based media, on individuals is similarly significant.

As we praise the 50th commemoration of Bangladesh’s freedom and introspect on its encouraging, it is judicious to be imaginative about experiential pointers to quantify the condition of our improvement on the ground as opposed to indiscriminately confiding in stream down financial matters. It is additionally imperative to quantify the natural and social expenses of improvement. Not an end in itself, advancement should be surveyed (both quantitatively and subjectively) for the